qngmg85
Joined: 09 Mar 2011
Posts: 2
Read: 0 topics
Warns: 0/5 Location: England
|
|
Posted: Wed 10:42, 09 Mar 2011 Post subject: display subjects with their blemishes |
|
|
American Apparel images often display subjects with their blemishes,wholesale nhl jerseys imperfections and asymmetrical features highlighted and attached with brief, personal descriptions.[24] Many of the models in American Apparel's sexual advertising are recruited by Charney and his colleagues on the street, or company stores; others are selected after sending their photos directly to the company website.[24] Despite this, many consumers have noted the relatively small sizing American Apparel employs,rolex daytona,ed hardy jeans advising other shoppers to buy larger sizes than normal, though this may be the result of other retailers' use of vanity sizing to market to an overweight American public. Some critics have labeled their models as "cocaine-chic",[58] and another describing them as "pre-pubescent".[59]
For a time, Charney promoted a branding strategy that spotlighted his treatment of workers as a selling point for the company's merchandise, promoting American Apparel's goods as "sweatshop free."[27] In 2008, the company took out a series of political ads featuring the corporate logo that called current immigration laws an "apartheid system."[60] In regards to the company's image overseas, advisor Harry Parnass stated that the brand is about aspiration and that they are "selling the American dream."[61] He dismissed competitors who do the same but refuse to manufacture in America.
More recently,replica cartier watches the anti-globalization movement has arisen in opposition to corporate globalization, a process by which multinational corporations move their operations overseas in order to lower their costs and increase profits. The anti-sweatshop movement has much in common with the anti-globalization movement. Both consider sweatshops harmful, and both have accused many companies (such as the Walt Disney Company, The Gap, and Nike) of using sweatshops. The movement charges thatneoliberal globalization is similar to the sweating system. Furthermore, they argue that there tends to be a "race to the bottom", as multinationals leap from one low-wage country to another searching for lower production costs, in the same way that sweaters would have steered production to the lowest cost sub-contractor.
Anti-globalization activists and environmentalists also deplore transfer of heavy industrial manufacturing (such as chemical production) to the developing world. Although chemical factories have little in common with sweatshops in the original sense,rolex oyster detractors describe them as such and claim that there are negativeenvironmental and health impacts (such as pollution and birth defects, respectively) on workers and the local community.
The post has been approved 0 times
|
|